Monday, January 24, 2005

Close, The Alarm, And U2: The Words I've Been Holding In For Too Long


The song “Close” was released for review in the UK in mid-December 2004.   It’s little late in the album cycle for “In The Poppy Fields”, and without a single to sell in the stores, it’s kind of a wasted effort.   Still though, it’s nice to see The Alarm MMIV get some press, even though it’s not really the kind that does the much good.  Why? Because reading through most of the reviews of the single (Google '"The Alarm Close" review' to read what I mean) you might think it was 1986 all over again.  With a new U2 album out (the satisfyingly but light mega-hit  "How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb") the same year as a new Alarm album (the unsung adventurous comeback "In The Poppy Fields"),  comparisons have arisen again.    Almost every review, good or bad, says "Close" sounds like U2.     It’s funny though, because if you asked any one of those people to tell you the specific U2 song “Close” sounds like, they probably could not.   Why? Because, really, it doesn’t sound like U2 at all.  It sounds like an idealized burst of rock and roll , ardent in its obvious love for the medium, while gripping with simple lyrics of yearning and hope.  It’s what people think U2 “should” sound like, but have not for many years now (sorry, not even on their new album).  Furthermore, “Close” has none of the signature guitar sound of U2 or even much of Bono’s vox style.  It sounds more like a cross between Icicle Works and Echo And the Bunnymen, shouted from the roof-top of decaying building somewhere in the dystopia of cold-war Europe. Funny though, that "Close" was written in 2001, long before the current U2 album was even being considered…but then that's not really the point.   The point is, The Alarm and U2 have never really much sounded the same.  They were friends and confidants with similar ideals who played guitar rock at time when it was patently unfashionable to do so.  They might have affected each other in various ways, but that the influence was definitely not a one-way street.